Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: add rule to check if AsyncAPI document is defined or not #583

Conversation

magicmatatjahu
Copy link
Member

Description

Add rule to check if AsyncAPI document is defined or not.

cc @smoya

Related issue(s)
Part of #481
Part of #482

src/spectral.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
magicmatatjahu and others added 2 commits August 31, 2022 11:41
Co-authored-by: Sergio Moya <1083296+smoya@users.noreply.github.com>
@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu requested a review from smoya August 31, 2022 09:53
@magicmatatjahu
Copy link
Member Author

@smoya Done :) Please check again.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 1, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Copy link
Member

@smoya smoya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Greeeeeat!👏

@magicmatatjahu
Copy link
Member Author

/rtm

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit 28ef37b into asyncapi:next-major Sep 1, 2022
@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu deleted the next/spectarl-rule-for-non-AsyncAPI-file branch September 1, 2022 08:27
magicmatatjahu added a commit to magicmatatjahu/parser-js that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ready-to-merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants